Corey some of your chronology & causality is off here. The third paragraph beginning with “then” describes something which happened almost a year before the event which you imply preceded & provoked it. The reader gets the false impression the sensational Grusch testimony led NASA to stand up the UAP panel. In reality the panel had completed their work by this time.
Corey some of your chronology & causality is off here. The third paragraph beginning with “then” describes something which happened almost a year before the event which you imply preceded & provoked it. The reader gets the false impression the sensational Grusch testimony led NASA to stand up the UAP panel. In reality the panel had completed their work by this time.
David Grinspoon
Thanks for catching that. I rearranged part of the story in edit and didn't notice the error--fixed now.